Hi Ryan,
I've been noticing that Syracuse is taking a lot of recruits rated as 5.4 and 5.3 early on in the recruiting season. I was happy with last year's class, and it seemed like we were moving in the right direction, where we'd be recruiting higher ranked prospects now that we are an ACC team. Aren't the sub 5.5 rated players usually the B list prospects? I know there have been some good ones ranked at the 5.2-5.4 level (e.g. - Nassib, Pugh, etc.), but my concern is that we are grabbing these kids too early. Are we resigned that we are not going to get kids at the higher rating level? Just wondering what your thoughts are on this.
Thanks,
elclarkey
I've been noticing that Syracuse is taking a lot of recruits rated as 5.4 and 5.3 early on in the recruiting season. I was happy with last year's class, and it seemed like we were moving in the right direction, where we'd be recruiting higher ranked prospects now that we are an ACC team. Aren't the sub 5.5 rated players usually the B list prospects? I know there have been some good ones ranked at the 5.2-5.4 level (e.g. - Nassib, Pugh, etc.), but my concern is that we are grabbing these kids too early. Are we resigned that we are not going to get kids at the higher rating level? Just wondering what your thoughts are on this.
Thanks,
elclarkey
